Pedagogy

Rosenshine's principles of instruction

Rosenshine's principles are ten classroom-tested guidelines that synthesise research on cognitive science, master teachers, and classroom management into one short article.

By Philip BellLast updated 26 May 2026
Evidence
Strong
Subject
Cross-curricular
Key stage
All
Citations
3

Barak Rosenshine spent decades watching effective teachers and reading instructional research. In 2012 he published a ten-principle summary in the American Educator. It became the closest thing teaching has to a one-page evidence-based handbook.

What it is

Ten principles, each backed by a paragraph of practical examples. In order, they are: review previous learning, present new material in small steps, ask questions, provide models, guide pupil practice, check pupil understanding, obtain a high success rate, provide scaffolds for difficult tasks, build independent practice, and engage pupils in weekly and monthly review.

Why it matters

The list is short enough that a teacher can hold it in mind during planning. Each principle is grounded in cognitive science (small steps reduce cognitive load), in research on master teachers (models help novices), or in classroom management evidence (high success rates protect motivation).

Tom Sherrington’s 2019 book translates each principle into UK classroom practice. The EEF cognitive science review covers much of the same ground from a different angle.

How to use it

Pick one principle per half term and audit your lessons against it. A common starting point is the daily review: a five-minute starter retrieving last lesson, last week, and last term. After that, work on worked examples and guided practice.

The Chalk Retrieval Task and Worksheet Creator tools support the review and scaffolding principles directly.

When not to use it

The principles describe what tends to work in direct instruction. They are less useful as a sole guide for project work, inquiry learning, or extended writing tasks, where other research applies.

Retrieval Task supports principle one. Worksheet Creator supports principles two through five. Lesson Plan helps structure a lesson against the full ten.

Evidence

Strong evidence

The principles themselves are not a single intervention with one effect size. They are a synthesis of three evidence bases (cognitive science, research on expert teachers, instructional research). Each principle is independently well evidenced. The synthesis is the closest thing teaching has to a one-page evidence-based handbook.

Caveats

  • The principles describe direct instruction. They are less applicable to extended writing, debate, or open inquiry.
  • The synthesis predates the most recent evidence on retrieval and spacing. Treat the principles as a starting point, not the final word.

Try this in Chalk

Related concepts

Questions teachers ask

Are Rosenshine's principles a prescriptive method?
No. They are guidelines drawn from research and from watching effective teachers. The principles tell you what tends to work; they do not tell you exactly how to deliver a lesson.
Which principle matters most?
Begin with a short review of previous learning. It is the single most underused principle and the easiest to add to any lesson without changing planning.
How is this different from the EEF guidance?
Rosenshine's principles are an individual practitioner's synthesis from 2012. The EEF guidance reports are systematic reviews that come to overlapping but more cautious conclusions. Both are worth reading.
Try it in Chalk

Retrieval Task

Low-stakes recall task with icons and keywords for spaced practice across a unit.

Open Retrieval Task
Published 26 May 2026. Last reviewed 26 May 2026. Chalk content is reviewed against the evidence at least once a year.